Game Development Revenue Share: Contract Terms for Indie Developers Partnering With Publishers

Indie developers often enter publisher deals to solve the hardest parts of shipping a game: funding, marketing, platform access, localization, QA, and distribution. The tradeoff is almost always economic control—especially revenue share. A strong game development revenue share agreement can be the difference between a sustainable studio and a project that “succeeded” publicly but paid out poorly (or never).

This guide breaks down the most important contract terms in a game publishing agreement (indie) scenario from the client/buyer perspective (you, the developer). It’s designed to help you spot the clauses that impact your cash flow, IP, and long-term franchise potential.

Throughout, we’ll reference common structures found in an indie game publisher contract and explain how to negotiate a fair game revenue split contract that matches your project’s risks and contributions.

---

1) Start with the revenue share “headline”—then go deeper

Most developers focus on the top-line split: “70/30,” “60/40,” etc. But the real deal is in the definitions and deductions.

A revenue share clause typically depends on:

• What money is included (Gross vs Net, by platform, by territory)
• What is deducted before the split (refunds, chargebacks, taxes, platform fees, marketing spend, recoupment, advances)
• When it’s paid (timing, statements, reserves)
• How it’s audited (your right to verify)

Action step: Treat the “split %” as a summary. The contract’s definitions (especially “Net Revenue”) are where revenue share deals are won or lost.

---

2) Define “Gross Revenue” and “Net Revenue” like a lawyer (because it matters)

Gross Revenue

In many deals, Gross Revenue is the total amount actually received from sales before deductions (sometimes after platform fees, sometimes before). The contract must specify whether “gross” is:

• User price (e.g., $19.99 on Steam), or
• Platform remittance (Steam pays out after its fee), or
• Publisher receipts (publisher gets money from platforms/retailers)

Net Revenue

Most publisher deals split Net Revenue, not gross. Net is fine if it is tightly defined. Your game development revenue share agreement should precisely list allowed deductions, and ideally also list disallowed deductions.

Common deductions:

• Platform/store fees (Steam, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, Epic)
• Payment processing fees (for direct sales)
• Refunds, chargebacks, fraud losses
• Sales taxes/VAT/GST actually paid
• Third-party licensing fees (engine royalties, IP license)
• Localization/QA/ratings fees (sometimes)
• Marketing and PR spend (this is a big one)
• Advances and other recoupable costs (see Section 4)

Negotiation goal: Avoid vague phrasing like “any costs related to publishing.” Replace with an enumerated list plus caps/approval rights.

---

3) Watch the “waterfall”: the order in which money gets paid

A game revenue split contract often follows a “waterfall”:

1. Gross receipts come in
2. Certain deductions are taken (refunds, taxes, platform fees)
3. Remaining amount becomes Net Revenue
4. Publisher recoups approved costs/advance from Net (sometimes before the split)
5. The remainder is split between publisher and developer

Two major deal structures:

A) Split after recoup (publisher-friendly)

Publisher recoups its advance + expenses first, then you split what’s left. This can delay developer revenue for a long time.

B) Split of Net while recoup happens from publisher’s share (developer-friendly)

Net Revenue is split immediately, and the publisher recoups from its own portion. This means you get paid earlier and more predictably.

Practical compromise: If the publisher insists on recoup-from-Net-first, negotiate:

• A cap on recoupable categories
• Approval rights for spend above a threshold
• A time limit or spend window
• Exclusions (e.g., corporate overhead, salaries, unrelated tools)

---

4) Advances, recoupment, and “recoupable costs” (the hidden levers)

Many indie publisher deals include an advance or milestone-based funding. The advance is almost always recoupable (not “free money”). The contract should answer:

• Is the advance recouped from your revenue share, the publisher’s, or Net Revenue before split?
• Is it recouped across all platforms and territories (cross-collateralization)?
• Are marketing/UA spend and porting costs recoupable too?
• Is interest applied (ideally: no)?
• What happens if the game underperforms—can the publisher pursue repayment beyond revenue?

Red flag: Any clause that makes you personally liable for repayment outside revenue (e.g., debt-like language), unless the deal is explicitly structured as a loan and you intend that.

---

5) Cross-collateralization: one platform shouldn’t “eat” another

Cross-collateralization means the publisher can recoup costs from one revenue stream using another (e.g., PlayStation revenue used to recoup the Switch port cost). In a franchise and partnership context, this can seriously reduce your ability to reinvest.

Options to negotiate:

• No cross-collateralization (ideal)
• Cross-collateralization only within the same SKU (base game only, not DLC)
• Separate recoup pools for:
  • Base game vs DLC vs cosmetics
  • Each platform (PC vs console vs mobile)
  • Each territory
  • Each sequel (never let Game 2 cover Game 1’s deficit unless you intend it)

---

6) Define what “revenue” includes: DLC, IAP, bundles, subscriptions, and merch

Indie games rarely live on base game sales alone. Your game publishing agreement indie should specify treatment of:

• DLC/expansions
• In-app purchases (IAP) and virtual currency
• Cosmetics and season passes
• Bundles and deep discounts
• Subscription services (Game Pass, PS Plus, Apple Arcade-style deals)
• Cloud streaming licenses
• Ad revenue (if applicable)
• Physical editions and collector’s editions
• Merchandise, books, soundtrack, adaptations

Key point: Subscription or platform deals often pay lump sums or bonuses. Make sure those payments are explicitly included in “Gross/Net Revenue” and not carved out as “marketing support” or “platform incentives” that the publisher keeps.

---

7) Minimum marketing commitments vs “best efforts”

Marketing is the most common source of conflict because it’s expensive, hard to measure, and often recoupable.

In an indie game publisher contract, publishers may promise “commercially reasonable efforts” or “best efforts.” Those phrases are vague.

What you can ask for instead:

• A marketing plan attached as an exhibit (beats vague promises)
• Defined deliverables: trailer, store page optimization, PR beats, influencer outreach, convention presence
• A minimum spend (if marketing is recoupable, be careful—minimum spend can also mean bigger recoup)
• Approval rights for brand-sensitive materials
• Clear ownership and usage rights for creative assets (trailers, key art)

Balanced approach: Require transparency and planning rather than a large spend commitment that will later be deducted from your revenue.

---

8) Payment terms: frequency, statements, reserves, and currency conversion

Revenue share is only as good as the reporting and payout schedule.

Your game development revenue share agreement should include:

• Royalty statement frequency (monthly or quarterly are common)
• Payment timing (e.g., “within 30 days after quarter-end”)
• Minimum payout threshold (avoid overly high thresholds)
• Withholding/reserve for refunds/chargebacks (cap it, and require release schedule)
• Currency conversion method (rate source, timing, bank fees)
• Whether payments are made per platform or consolidated

Developer-friendly detail: Require platform-level detail (Steam, PlayStation, etc.) and line items for deductions.

---

9) Audit rights: your safety net

Audit clauses are often overlooked until something feels off—then it’s too late.

A workable audit clause should specify:

• Your right to audit royalty statements and books at least once per year
• Reasonable notice (e.g., 10–30 days)
• Use of an independent auditor under NDA
• Scope: including platform statements and invoices supporting deductions
• Who pays for the audit:
  • You pay, unless underpayment exceeds a threshold (e.g., 5%), then publisher pays plus interest and correction

If a publisher refuses audit rights entirely, that’s a major trust issue in a long-term franchise partnership.

---

10) IP ownership, sequels, and franchise control (don’t trade your future for a launch)

From a franchise & partnership perspective, the biggest risk is not just revenue—it’s control over the IP and derivative works.

Your contract should clearly cover:

• Who owns the game IP, code, art, characters, universe
• Whether the publisher gets a license (preferred) or assignment (dangerous)
• Whether the publisher has:
  • Right of first refusal / first negotiation on sequels
  • Options on future games in the same universe
  • Control over adaptations (film, TV, comics)
• Reversion: what happens to publishing rights if milestones aren’t met or the game is delisted?

Developer-friendly position: You own the IP; publisher receives an exclusive (or limited) license to publish the specific title, for a defined term, on defined platforms, with reversion triggers.

---

11) Platform scope, territory, and exclusivity

Revenue share should match scope. If the publisher asks for “all platforms worldwide forever,” the economics should reflect that.

Key scope terms to lock down:

• Platforms: PC, console, mobile, VR
• Storefronts: Steam, Epic, GOG, consoles, direct sales
• Territory: worldwide vs specific regions
• Exclusivity: full, timed, or none
• Porting responsibility: who builds and pays for ports? Is it recoupable?

Tip: If the publisher isn’t funding or executing a platform, consider carving it out—or setting a separate split for that platform.

---

12) Milestones, acceptance, and what happens if they “reject” your build

Funding and publishing agreements often use milestones with acceptance criteria. Disputes happen when “acceptance” is subjective.

Protect yourself by ensuring:

• Milestones have objective deliverables (build version, feature list, performance targets)
• Clear review periods (e.g., 10 business days to accept or provide written issues)
• A cure/revision process
• No indefinite “acceptance” delays that also delay payments or launch

---

13) Term, termination, and rights reversion

A revenue share deal isn’t just about launch—it’s about lifecycle.

Your contract should specify:

• Term length (e.g., 3–7 years) and renewal rules
• Termination for breach and cure periods
• Termination for convenience (rare, but sometimes mutual)
• What happens after termination:
  • Revenue share continues for existing sales for a wind-down period
  • Publisher must remove listings or transfer storefront control
  • Clear handling of player data, community channels, and support

Reversion triggers to consider:

• Failure to launch by a long-stop date
• Failure to meet minimum marketing obligations (if defined)
• Material breach not cured
• Publisher insolvency

---

14) Data access, community, and live ops (especially relevant for long-tail revenue)

If your game depends on ongoing updates, you need access to:

• Sales dashboards (at least reporting)
• Customer support tickets (or summaries)
• Community channels (Discord, Steam forums)
• Telemetry/analytics (subject to privacy laws)

Define who owns and controls:

• Mailing lists
• Player accounts
• Community moderation
• Patch schedules and approvals

These terms affect not just revenue share but your ability to build the next franchise installment.

---

15) Practical negotiation checklist (developer-friendly)

When reviewing an indie game publisher contract, focus on these high-impact points:

1. Net Revenue definition (enumerated deductions, no vague language)
2. Recoupment structure (split before/after recoup; caps; approvals)
3. Cross-collateralization limits (separate pools by SKU/platform/DLC)
4. Inclusion of all deal revenue (subscriptions, bonuses, bundles)
5. Marketing spend controls (plan + approvals vs unlimited recoupable spend)
6. Reporting + payment cadence (quarterly minimum; transparent statements)
7. Audit rights (annual, independent, underpayment threshold)
8. IP ownership and sequel rights (license only; reversion triggers)
9. Scope alignment (platform/territory/exclusivity matches value provided)
10. Termination and storefront transfer (exit plan and reversion)

---

Conclusion: A fair revenue share is a system, not a percentage

A well-structured game development revenue share agreement should do more than state a split—it should define what money counts, what gets deducted, how quickly you get paid, and how you protect your IP for the long run. If you treat the contract as a franchise partnership document rather than a launch checklist, you’ll negotiate terms that support both your current release and the studio you’re trying to build.

If you’re drafting or revising a game revenue split contract or game publishing agreement indie, tools like Contractable can help you generate clear clauses, compare alternatives, and avoid missing key terms—learn more at https://www.contractable.ai.

---

Other questions you might ask next

• What’s a typical revenue split in an indie publisher deal for PC vs console?
• Should I agree to “Net Revenue” or push for a Gross-based split?
• How do subscription deals (Game Pass/PS Plus) get shared in a publisher contract?
• What marketing expenses should be recoupable—and which should be excluded?
• How do I negotiate audit rights if a publisher pushes back?
• What’s the best way to limit cross-collateralization in multi-platform launches?
• How do I protect sequel and spin-off rights while still giving a publisher incentives?
• What clauses determine who controls pricing, discounts, and seasonal sales?
• What happens to revenue share after termination or if the publisher is acquired?
• Should I use an exclusive publisher, or split publishing by platform/region?